I am not clear. Are you still waiting for votes or were you respinning a new candidate?
Ralph > On Oct 23, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Dominik Psenner <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Thanks for your patience and thanks for the efforts you put into this to get > another release out of the door! > > So far I've re-checked the website and it looks better now. The SDK reference > looks different now but that doesn't bother me. The old format had some > broken encoding and the current SDK reference is a improvement from that > point of view. However, there are a few things that might be worth fixing. > The following lists these ordered by priority+effort: > > * In the SDK reference have some images gone missing or look odd: > ** Item.gif > ** SyncTOC.gif > ** ExpandAll.bmp > ** CollapseAll.bmp > * Clicking on Community/Issue Tracking or Community/Mailing List brings up > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html, > respectively > http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/issue-tracking.html. On both > of these sites new menu items appear under Project Documentation: > Continuous Integration > Source Repository > Project License > Project Team > Issue Tracking > Mailing Lists > These items have a different indentation and both "Issue tracking" and > "Mailing Lists" is also listed under "Community". > > Please note that both of these are not blockers and definitely just nice to > haves. The rest of the website looks just great! Good work! For now I'll go > to bed. But if all goes according to my plans, tomorrow evening I'll take a > look at the binaries. I won't check the issue tracker if there are issues > worth to be fixed as I will not have the time to fix them. > > To everyone out there who has patches ready, please bring them forth within > the next 24 hours and I will take a look at them. I would prefer a patch sent > to log4net-dev, but attaching it to a JIRA issue is fine by me too. The only > must have is that the patch must apply safely to the current trunk and should > be easily code-reviewable / tested with unit tests. > > Good night and read you soon > > > 2015-10-23 18:49 GMT+02:00 Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]>: >> Take your time. It diesn't matter whether you vote two days earlier or >> later. >> >> Stefan >> >> On 2015-10-23, Dominik Psenner wrote: >> >> > Apologies, I've been terribly busy this week. Right now I'm on the way to a >> > birthday party and I hope that afterwards I'm (still) able to review the >> > release. Then we might start a new vote and see how it goes. Read you soon. >> > On 21 Oct 2015 4:54 p.m., "Jeremiah Gowdy" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> 1 Release these artifacts >> >> >>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 11:20 PM, Stefan Bodewig <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> log4net 1.2.14 RC1 is available for review here: >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4net >> >>> (revision 10847) >> >> >>> Details of changes since 1.2.13 are in the release notes: >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/release/release-notes.html >> >> >>> The tag is here: >> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/tags/1.2.14RC1 >> >>> (revision 1709237) >> >> >>> Site: >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~bodewig/log4net/site/ >> >> >>> will need to get adapted to mention support for 4.5, this can happen >> >>> during the time frame of the vote. >> >> >>> Votes, please. This vote will close in 72 hours, not before 0700 GMT >> >>> 21-Oct 2015 >> >> >>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts >> >>> [ ] +0 OK, but... >> >>> [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... >> >>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because... > > > > -- > Dominik Psenner
