I'm working on a system that is using Lucene 1.0.2 I'm a contractor, so, while I'm encrouging there immediate upgrade, I'm not able to make them to so.
They have huge indexing performance issues. I would guess there's some pretty drastic differences between 1.0.2 and 2.3, eh? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Steven A Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, looking closer, I see that release 1.02 *was* referred to as 1.0.2 - > see Lucene's home page as of July 2002: > > < > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/docs/index.html?revision=149779&pathrev=149912 > > > > The contents of the above-linked page are included here, in part: > > 12 June 2002 - Lucene 1.2 Final Released > > The Lucene Team is proud to announce the release of Lucene 1.2. > This is the first production release of Lucene since it moved > to the Apache project. This release contains many features and > bug fixes over the previous 1.0.2 release - see CHANGES.txt for > details. Binary and source distributions are available here. > > Lucene v1.02 released > > This release repackages Lucene as a product of the Apache > Software Foundation. Download it here. > > But neither "1.02" nor "1.0.2" is mentioned in CHANGES.txt, which was first > committed to the repository in November 2001, after the 1.2 release > candidate series had started - here's the first version of CHANGES.txt: > > < > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/trunk/CHANGES.txt?revision=149623 > > > > Although there is a tagged directory in the Subversion repository for > release "1.01", I don't see one for "1.02"/"1.0.2". If you *really* need > this, you could probably recover it by searching the Apache mailing list > archives for the 1.02 release announcement, and then check out the state of > the repository on that date. Sounds like fun :). > > My guess, given the "production release" wording from the July 2002 home > page, is that the 1.0.2 release was not worthy of the term "production". > > Out of curiosity, why do you need documentation for version 1.0.2? > > Steve > > On 10/17/2008 at 1:54 PM, ChadDavis wrote: > > Thanks for the help, and pointing me to the right mailing list ;) > > > > On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Steven A Rowe > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Chad, > > > > > > Not too many people watch the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list - much more traffic > > > over on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Lucene didn't use a patch version number until 1.4.X - before then, > > > releases were called "release candidates", e.g. "1.2 rc1", "1.2 final". > > > > > > My guess is that you're looking for one of the 1.2 releases; the first > > > Lucene release under the Apache Jakarta project, after the move from > > > Sourceforge, was initially referred to as "1.02". > > > > > > However, AFAICT from looking at CHANGES.txt, the "1.02" name was > > > changed to "1.2", with a series of release candidates starting in > > > October 2001, culminating in "1.2 rc6", a.k.a. "1.2 final", in June > > > 2002. > > > > > > You can see the 1.2 series in the tag directories under the link Grant > > > mentioned. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > On 10/17/2008 at 1:22 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > > > I think you'd have to dig into the SVN archive: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/ > > > > > > > > Although, I don't see 1.0.2 there. That was pre my time in > > > > Lucene, so > > > > not sure. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 16, 2008, at 3:49 PM, ChadDavis wrote: > > > > > > > > > Where can I get doc for 1.0.2? The lucene site apparently only > goes > > > > > back to 1.4.3 > > > > > > > > -------------------------- Grant Ingersoll Lucene Boot Camp Training > > > > Nov. 3-4, 2008, ApacheCon US New Orleans. > http://www.lucenebootcamp.com > > > > > > > > > > > > Lucene Helpful Hints: > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance > > > > http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ >
