Hi, Refer to these: http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.6/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_supportedPlatforms&; https://support.lucidworks.com/entries/23291411-LucidWorks-in-cloud-mode-SolrCloud-on-Windows
Regards, Aloke On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Marc Loeb < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I think as well using SolrCloud or ElasticSearch is a better choice. All > our other components run in .Net on Azure with Windows. Even that Azure > enables now any Linux OS I would prefer Windows OS for production due to > more knowlege available in our team. What are the reasons to prefer Linux > over Windows for SolrCloud you have in mind? > > Many thanks, > Marc > > On 20.08.2013, at 21:41, "Aloke Ghoshal" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > You'd be much better off switching over to SolrCloud. You could use an > > existing dot net client library (such as SolrNet) to connect to > SolrCloud. > > The other bit to keep in mind is that for production you should ideally > be > > running SolrCloud on a *nix (Linux/ Unix) OS. > > > > Regards, > > Aloke > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Marc Loeb < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> > >> I have an Lucene.NET implementation with as a prototype that I need to > >> rework. It seems to me that Lucene.NET is not up to date (last commit > >> Jan 13) and seems to use Lucene 3.0.3. > >> > >> > >> > >> My major issue is that I scaling was not considered at design time, but > >> needs to be done now. Lucene does not support shards and replicas (but > >> solr can) - at least from my first impression. > >> > >> > >> > >> My current alternatives for scaling seem to look like this: > >> > >> - Move to Solar cloud, abandon the current implementation > >> > >> - Create a shard/replica mechanism for Lucene > >> > >> > >> > >> Any ideas? Thanks! > >> > >> Marc > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Marc Loeb < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > I think as well using SolrCloud or ElasticSearch is a better choice. All > our other components run in .Net on Azure with Windows. Even that Azure > enables now any Linux OS I would prefer Windows OS for production due to > more knowlege available in our team. What are the reasons to prefer Linux > over Windows for SolrCloud you have in mind? > > Many thanks, > Marc > > On 20.08.2013, at 21:41, "Aloke Ghoshal" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > You'd be much better off switching over to SolrCloud. You could use an > > existing dot net client library (such as SolrNet) to connect to > SolrCloud. > > The other bit to keep in mind is that for production you should ideally > be > > running SolrCloud on a *nix (Linux/ Unix) OS. > > > > Regards, > > Aloke > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Marc Loeb < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi > >> > >> > >> > >> I have an Lucene.NET implementation with as a prototype that I need to > >> rework. It seems to me that Lucene.NET is not up to date (last commit > >> Jan 13) and seems to use Lucene 3.0.3. > >> > >> > >> > >> My major issue is that I scaling was not considered at design time, but > >> needs to be done now. Lucene does not support shards and replicas (but > >> solr can) - at least from my first impression. > >> > >> > >> > >> My current alternatives for scaling seem to look like this: > >> > >> - Move to Solar cloud, abandon the current implementation > >> > >> - Create a shard/replica mechanism for Lucene > >> > >> > >> > >> Any ideas? Thanks! > >> > >> Marc > >> > >> >
