And what does high throughput actually mean in terms of number of documents per second and bytes (or terms) per document?
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: > Please post the original question here, so that everything people need > to review your question is included within this thread! > > Oh, and for a high-throughput system, 8Gb RAM doesn't sound like much. A > Lucene index, whether inside Solr or not, benefits from a lot of RAM. > > Thanks! > > Upayavira > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2015, at 05:19 AM, Argho Chatterjee wrote: > > Hello Everyone, > > > > I had posted a question on stackoverflow.com after performing a few POCs > > > > My hadrware consist of a single i-3 intel processor (4 CPU as per > > "dxdiag" > > on run ), 8GB Ram, Laptop machine. > > > > My Question Link : > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30823314/lucene-vs-solr-indexning-speed-for-sampe-data > > > > but no one could solve it as of now.. > > I hope the question I posted is undertandable. > > > > Please if anyone could help me out with the indexing speed of Solr (way > > slower) vs Lucene (way faster).. > > > > I am trying to build a module for real time indexing and querying, and > > the > > traffic is high, POC pass with Lucene for handling High Traffic for > > Indexing, for Solr It is not able to do so.. > > > > Again My Machine Spec : > > HP, intel core i3, 8GB ram, TB HDD. > > > > Please let me know if there is a problem with Solr or am I doing anything > > wrong. > > > > Thanks > > Argho >
