crikey. here it is: http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/
> On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:54 PM, will martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://ciir.edu > > >> On Apr 15, 2016, at 9:53 PM, will martin <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> coir.edu there;s a paper by croft et al about the impact of structured data >> onslaught being handled by IR engines with strengths in unstructured. >> >>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 1:01 PM, Diego Bernardes <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I'm a long time user of Elasticsearch and Solr, have used in lots of >>> projects, but until now didn't need to change how the documents are scored. >>> >>> The actual project my team is developing have a very specific need of >>> precision and scoring. >>> Recentely found Algolia, they built a search engine from scratch using a >>> different aproach from Lucene. The main diffence is on scoring, in my >>> opinion the way they score is better suited to structured documents (like >>> products on a ecommerce), the sort is like a sql database, when there are >>> criterias and they are sorted in order. >>> >>> The way Lucene works with a single float score works very well for >>> unestructured documents, but when you know exactly what you want and in >>> what field, Algolia approach seems better. >>> >>> The question is, there is any way to do overwrite the way Lucene score? I >>> need to have several fields or a object, intead of a single float, >>> something like this: >>> >>> { >>> exactMatch: 2, >>> typo: 0, >>> customFieldScore: 10 >>> ... >>> } >>> >>> Thanks! >> > http://ciir.cs.umass.edu/
