On Jun 25, 2007, at 8:27 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
Hi,
Sheila asked me to compile a list of the remaining wiki tasks to
figure out next actions...
Push out
+ Wiki Homepage
+ Planning Wiki Area
+ Engineering Wiki Area
+ Notes Wiki Area
Deprecate
+ Projects
+ Journal
Questions:
+ Do we need to have all of the content in place before we push out
the remaining high-level wiki areas? Perhaps we could just put in
placeholder text for now? Or get everyone to do a first pass by the
end of next week? I'm concerned that if we wait until all of the
content is in, we won't leave ourselves enough time to test the
next wiki areas.
+ JARED: What are you preparing to put on the wiki for the Service?
LIST OF MISSING CONTENT
Wiki Homepage: http://chandlerproject.org/Product/ChandlerProjectHome
+ Tagline and Project Description: MIMI and KATIE
+ Technologies section: KATIE
+ Review Community stuff: TED
I've got this one
+ Engineering wiki area description: KATIE
+ Planning wiki area description: SHEILA
Community Area: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/CommunityArea
+ Open Issue: Is it okay for Get Involved to just be a part of the
Community Wiki Area? - TED, SHEILA, KATIE?
I think that Get Involved is probably a page that can be linked from
multiple places. I am happy to own that if that is what you are asking
Planning Area: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/PlanningArea
+ High level description - SHEILA
Engineering Area: http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/EngineeringArea
+ Open issue: How is what's on this page different from For
Developers? - KATIE / TED / PHILIPPE?
- http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/ForDevelopers
I mostly agree with Katie's note on this -- I'll put my comments in a
reply to her note.
Ted
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
