On 12 Jul, 2007, at 12:42, Mimi Yin wrote:

Hi Grant,

I agree that the DesktopSource page could be cleaned up a bit, though I feel I'm not the best person to do that. Katie/Ted, is this part of your Developers Wiki efforts?

Personally, I would just be up for blowing away the red double- outline :o. But in any case, the highlighting of the last "Release" of 16+ months ago, and the associated between-the-lines kind of implications, will be obsolete once Preview ships.

I think though the terminology will necessarily be different for end-users versus Developers. Developers distinguish between the two. End-users probably shouldn't think too objectively about this kind of stuff. I always find it weird when I'm reading end-user agreements and what-not. Feels like someone is watching me. (Or...maybe I'm misunderstanding what your terminology comment was about.)

No, you're right re: terminology.

--Grant


Mimi

On Jul 12, 2007, at 12:25 PM, Grant Baillie wrote:

Delicious!

My one issue -- and I think it's probably not a big deal -- is that we have a red double-outlined box on ChandlerDesktopSource saying that the latest official Chandler release is “Release 0.6.1, 2006-02-08”. Should I consider this an incentive to get Preview out the door :) ?

In any case, maybe the terminology in the two pages (Releases/ Milestones/Continuous vs Latest/At-Your-Own-Risk) could be synced or x-referenced better?

--Grant

On 12 Jul, 2007, at 10:58, Mimi Yin wrote:

I've pulled together 2 sets of Download pages with some help from Bear :)

Downloading Chandler Desktop and Building Chandler Desktop from the Source Code
http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/DownloadChandlerDesktop
http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ChandlerDesktopSource

Downloading Chandler Server and Building Chandler Server from the Source Code
http://chandlerproject.org/Journal/DownloadChandlerServer
http://chandlerproject.org/Projects/ChandlerServerSource

I'd like to move all download links to the Developers Wiki except for Download Chandler Desktop, which should live in the recently deprecated Projects Wiki and display as chandlerproject.org/ download (as per the URL plan Jared and I worked out.)

Does anyone see any issues with this proposal?

Mimi

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list
http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to