Mimi Yin wrote: > 1. The top bar (where currently there is only: Open Source Applications > Foundation) was intended to display 'news items' like new releases. (See > mock-up.)
I've actually come to the opinion that what is on chandlerproject.org
now is fine. Alternatively I could see:
... .6 *.7* .8 ...
0.7.1 - Oct 10, 2007
The reason is that I believe most people who come to chandlerproject.org
will do so to download the desktop. The second most numerous group will
be people logging in to Hub, but IMO Hub does not need version number on
chandlerproject.org. And since we want to keep the server a bit less
visible, just adding the server version number next to the server
download link like in your mockup would be fine.
> 2. We should probably have release numbers for both Desktop, Hub and
> Server, which should take care of Heikki's layout concerns.
I don't think we need to specify Hub's version anywhere on
chandlerproject.org. Users of Hub will see the version from Hub itself.
> 3. The lack of a green download arrow for 'Download Server' is
> deliberate just as Jeffrey said. (Our problem doesn't seem to be that
> people can't find it, but that it's still too prominent for many end-users!)
OK by me.
--
Heikki Toivonen
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Open Source Applications Foundation "General" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/general
