I'm -1 as well and agree with David J. The proper release process (even for a pom) is to first cut the candidate on which is voted. Instead of first voting and then cutting the candidate.
Carsten David Jencks wrote: > -1 > > > I think the scm info is wrong. I'm also always reluctant to vote on > something that is not the final artifact in its final location: in this > case it would be a pom under portals-pom/tags with version 1.0. > > If you are using the release plugin (as implied by the use of the apache > pom version 5) and the apache nexus for releases I'd expect the artifact > for voting would be in a staging repo in nexus. > > Also the indenting looks inconsistent in firefox -- mostly tabs but I > think a few spaces. Not enough for a -1 but if the scm info needs to be > fixed fixing the indent should be easy. > > If I'm wrong about the scm info I'll happily withdraw the -1. > > thanks > david jencks -- Carsten Ziegeler [email protected]
