We all have our pet peeve's and skeletons we'd like to bury :) Do you want to work on WS-Resource* on ws-fx as well? I was thinking of taking a stab at either WS-Eventing or WS-Notification soon.
thanks, dims --- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ias wrote: > >>FYI, http://ws.apache.org/ws-fx/addressing/ > > > > Thanks very much for your nice work! > > > > Hoping Apache Addressing's thriving future with interest and participation > > from people everywhere, > > > > While I am glad that we are keeping up with the WS-* standards, I am > unsure about the whole sub-addressing feature of WS addressing (or > alternate proposals), that essentially add a new destination to a > endpoint above and beyond the current (url,SOAPAction) tuple. Now every > header can take a ws-addressing address and use that to redirect the > message. > > That may let you tack on more stuff to the same endpoint, but at the > same time the nice and simple notion of "one url, one service" is lost. > It almost represents the complete divorce of WS-* from the REST > architecture. > > Thank you for the code though Dims! I will be using it in > WS-ResourceFramework related stuff :) > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
