+1, at least for record
On 8/30/05, Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 from me. > > Samisa... > > On 8/30/05, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for Axis > > 1.x named "axis", not "axis1". > > > > I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we are > > marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0. > > > > I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source > > trees. > > > > Here is my: +1 > > > > -- > > > > Tom Jordahl > > > > Macromedia Server Development > > > > >
