moving from pmc to general to try and reach more PMC members...


----- Forwarded by Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM on 05/07/2008 10:50 AM -----

Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM wrote on 04/30/2008 01:23:01 PM:

> Hello PMC members,
>
> I started a vote to add some new committers to the Muse project last
> Monday (see general and muse-dev), but we haven't received any PMC
> votes yet. All of the active committers have given a +1, but these
> are not binding votes. Please take the time to review the vote email
> (below) and send in your vote; the nominees are willing and the
> content is there, but we need some new leaders if the project is
> going to move forward.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>

> ----- Forwarded by Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/IBM on 04/30/2008 01:16 PM -----
>
> Daniel Jemiolo/Durham/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/21/2008 03:28:50 PM:
>
> > Lately there has been a lot of talk on the Muse mailing list about
> > pulling all of contributions from the last year together and
> > creating a 2.3 release. Of course, it won't be as simple as that:
> > there are lots of new features and plenty of important bug fixes
> > based on real world experience with the code, but unfortunately, the
> > current committers have been pulled away to other projects. I think
> > that it's time to nominate some new committers, people who have
> > shown that they can maintain and grow the Muse code base through
> > their code contributions and time volunteered helping others on the
> > mailing list.
> >
> > Below is the list of people that I am nominating to take on the
> > responsibility of shaping, testing, and delivering Muse 2.3.0; they
> > will be joined by existing committers Vinh Nguyen (Cisco) and Joel
> > Hawkins (Compuware).
> >
> >
> > Saurabh Dravid - Saurabh initially worked on the Eclipse TPTP
> > project, building Eclipse tooling for Muse users. Much of his bug
> > reporting (and solving) is split between Apache and Eclipse bug
> > trackers, but together these two sources show that he is very
> > comfortable getting knee deep in the code and solving problems. With
> > that knowledge under his belt, Saurabh is now contributing new
> > features around security and resource discovery, things that are
> > crucial to deployers and could not be completed without lots of
> > intense study and determination.
> >
> > Balan Subramanian - Everything I said about Saurabh can be applied
> > equally to Balan. Balan has also spent years handling the legal and
> > administrative issues surrounding open source development with
> > Apache and Eclipse (from a corporate perspective), and is well-
> > suited to review new contributions and ensure that due diligence is
> > in place for all of them; the 2.3 contributions come from sources
> > that are more disparate than ever, so this skill and patience is
important.
> >
> > Chris Twiner - Chris Twiner is a 'real world' user of Muse who has
> > found and cracked many tough problems in the code base. In my
> > personal opinion, his contributions on MUSE-270[1] alone are enough
> > to warrant nomination, but his involvement is not limited to this.
> > In addition to being a significant code contributor, Chris is an
> > active mailing list problem solver who often has insight that the
> > original developers could not have had when they first wrote the
> > code; he has also shown the tact and resourcefulness that I think is
> > required to balance the needs of new users with the desire of
> > developers to move forward.
> >
> > Kam Yee - Kam has made strong contributions in an area that is
> > extremely important but often overlooked because of its difficulty:
> > he has created a test harness for Muse FVT and SVT, including WS-*
> > spec compliance. This is something that we've wanted for a very long
> > time, but the complexity of WS-* deployment and testing has pushed
> > it to the bottom of the list. I think Kam's work will be key to
> > ensuring that we don't have regressions in spec compliance or in the
> > tedious-but-important WSDL/SOAP/codegen issues that we face all the
time.
> >
> >
> > Committers and PMC members: please reply to muse-dev and general
> > with your votes. You can either send one vote for all or vote for
> > each individual separately.
> >
> > Here is my +1 for all four nominees.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan
> >
> >
> > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MUSE-270

Reply via email to