I've also started a thread at CXF. Since MUSE is described as working on OSGi, it might just drop in, and if it adds desirable functionality ...
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <[email protected]>wrote: > No objections from me. > > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Glen Daniels <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Agreed that it's a boundary case, however if these guys (I'm assuming > their > > team is at least a few people?) are up for trying to revive the project, > I'm > > at least willing to entertain that notion. If they submit some serious > code > > (via patches at first) and are up to maintaining it, I'm personally OK > with > > doing some fast-tracking of the team as committers. > > > > Is everyone OK if we hold off the MUSE resolution until our next report, > and > > see what if anything develops here? So this month we'd submit the WSIF > and > > jUDDI resolutions. > > > > Thanks, > > --Glen > > > > On 8/15/2010 12:26 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote: > >> I'd consider this to be a boundary case. > >> > >> On one hand, it is of course in the interest of anyone to have the > >> project alive, rather than retired. OTOH, while Jonas has contributed > >> some bug reports (4), including patches and has voiced on the MUSE > >> mailing lists from time to time (4 times, exluding this mail), that's > >> not sufficient for me to say "no problem, just make him a committer" > >> without hesitation. > >> > >> And, of course, he still has the option to continue on SourceForge or > >> something like that. > >> > >> Jochen > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Jonas Buys <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> I am a Ph.D. student working at the university of Antwerp (Belgium) on > reliability improvement of XML-based web services. For our work, we are > using Apache MUSE which we host on top of Axis2 1.5.1. Some of our students > are also using MUSE for their master thesis. > >>> > >>> We are afraid to see the vote that is currently going on to retire MUSE > to the Apache Attic. By retiring the project, we fear that the consequences > such as a read-only JIRA section may impede further improvements of MUSE. > >>> > >>> For some time now, we have been maintaining an internal MUSE build in > which we have patched open issues/bugs as we encountered them and improved > parts of its implementation, like we recently did for MUSE's default WS-SG > implementation. Furthermore, apart from fixing occasional bugs and/or > limitations, we are currently finishing an RC-status implementation of the > MOWS specification. We would be willing to donate this code to the > foundation (after code cleanup and thorough testing). > >>> > >>> Has it already been decided MUSE is "fin-de-vie"? Or is there still a > chance to revive the project? > >>> > >>> We are looking forward to your reply. > >>> > >>> Sincerely Yours, > >>> -- > >>> Jonas Buys > >>> --------------------------------------- > >>> University of Antwerp > >>> Dept. Mathematics and Computer Science > >>> PATS Research Group > >>> --------------------------------------- > >>> Middelheimlaan 1, Bld G, Off G322 > >>> B-2020 Antwerp > >>> --------------------------------------- > >>> (T) +32 472 365108 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) >
