Sam Ruby wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >
> > Now, I wonder: is 'forrest' still the right name for the two things
> > combined?
>
> I think of them as one thing, that's why I want them combined.
Absolutely. No question about it.
> If you look
> at the project descriptors, there are things in there that I always
> intended for future expansion, such as the locations of the home pages for
> the various projects. I know where I want to end up, and with your help
> (and John and perhaps others), we will end up there faster.
That's for very sure.
> I am neither possessive nor easily offended. If you want to use gump as
> the name for the combined effort, that would be fine with me. Or forrest
> if you prefer. Or some new name entirely is also OK with me. You pick.
>
> All I know or care about is what parts I want to work on next. ;-)
Ok, let's stick with forrest, then.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
