On 03.04.2005 14:52:48 Thomas DeWeese wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: <snip/> > > Rhino: Now this is interesting. Cocoon uses Rhino-1.6R1 and claims it is > > distributed under the MPL 1.1 but when I download either 1.6R1 or > > 1.5R4.1 (the one Batik uses according to the license file) then I see a > > reference to NPL 1.1 for both. The website says the same [1]. I found a > > post by Greg Stein from Jan 2004 (on the discontinued licensing mailing > > list) that NPL and MPL 1.0 are not ok, while MPL 1.1 is ok. Anyway, I > > don't see this as a showstopper for the release as we're not doing > > anything else than Cocoon. But I want to get this clarified. > > Are there four licenses NPL 1.0, MPL 1.0 (both not OK), > NPL 1.1 (unknown status), MPL 1.1 (is OK) or was there a typo > above?
I was talking about the NPL in general. I was not referring to a specific version. Greg Stein's post also didn't mention a version number for the NPL. So, not really a typo but a possible cause for misunderstanding. > Also you say this isn't a show stopper but you want to get it > clarified. Does this mean that as far as you are concerned I can > go ahead, or should I wait on the clarification? If you want, you can wait. But I'd say you don't have to. If we have a problem here, then Cocoon has, too. > > One question: Is the pdf-transcoder.jar revision 1.9 [2] the one you > > created from the "batik-1_6" tag in FOP? I can't be sure from the log > > entry. > > Yes, it is, I forgot to include it in the log message (I would > have updated the log entry if we were using SVN ;). *g* Thanks for the clarification. > > Lastly, I'd have preferred that the final vote only ran on batik-dev > > (for the Batik committers) and xmlgraphics-general (for the PMC). > > There's a bit too much noise ATM. > > Do I really need to run another vote on batik-dev? Cameron > has already given his +1 twice. BTW the mod-box doesn't seem to > be collecting mails for April... No, but CCing batik-dev so everyone knows that the PMC is voting on the release is generally a good idea, although not strictly necessary. Cameron's vote, in any case, wasn't necessary. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
