On 03.12.2008 11:48:40 Vincent Hennebert wrote: <snip/> > >> Plus, while it makes sense to replace > >> minus-sign with hyphen-minus when minus-sign is not available, the other > >> way around is not acceptable. Anyway, since in practice this will > >> probably never happen, the whole thing can probably be simplified. > > > > Not acceptable under whose authority? You're stating your opinion. > > Under the authority of the Unicode standard as I understand it. In some > cases hyphen-minus may be interpreted as a minus sign (section 6.2, > “General Punctuation”), but the opposite appears nowhere.
Ah, we're looking in different places. I'm looking in the code charts. Section 6.2 talks about the semantics of the characters, but I'm talking about glyph selection. I don't think that's the same. FOP has to interpret characters according to section 6.2 during layout but (IMO) when it comes to painting glyphs the semantics are not necessarily applicable if you try to provide fallbacks. <snip/> Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
