https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50498

Glenn Adams <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams <[email protected]> 2012-04-10 19:31:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 26423 [details]
> Patch to reject top-level typed nodes
> 
> This patch rejects top-level typed nodes with an exception.

+            String about = attributes.getValue(XMPConstants.RDF_NAMESPACE,
"about");                                                                       
+            if (this.contextStack.peek().equals(this.meta) && (about != null))
{                                                                               
+                //rdf:RDF is the parent, so this is a top-level item that
isn't                                                                           
+                //an rdf:Description, which isn't allowed.                     
+                throw new SAXException("Top-level element " + qName + " not an
rdf:Description");                                                              
+            }                                                                  

(1) the check this.contextStack.peek().equals(this.meta) would also return true
if xmp:xmpmeta is the parent;

(2) that <!{xmp|rdf}:* rdf:about=""> is the same as 'not an rdf:Description' is
not clear to me; aren't there other possibilities for 'not an rdf:Description'
that do not have rdf:about?

could you update patch accordingly, and also provide junit tests that test this
new functionality both for absence and presence (see
test/java/org/apache/xmlgraphics/xmp/XMPParserTest.java)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to