On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28 AM, Chris Bowditch <[email protected]> wrote: > Many thanks for your efforst so far. You've made some good progress. One > thing I don't like about the current behaviour of the side bar is the fact > that it expands the entire FOP sub project and you then have to scroll for > ages to find the right section. Is there no way to have it function like a > tree, only expanding those nodes which you ask to expand by clicking?
Yeah... I was thinking about that. I was pretty stoked I was able to get this far on that functionality. I'm sure it's just a bit more tinkering to get the desired effect. >> I'm open to hearing constructive criticism from the crew. >> >> http://xmlgraphics.staging.apache.org/ >> >> Brief list of Issues: >> - the page design is missing something (perhaps remove the logo from >> the top-left of page and leave it in the top of the sidenav?) >> - get more graphics involved in the design (page graphics? batik graphics? >> etc.) > > Yes, it is a requirement for sub projects to have their own logo. FOP and > Batik both have a logo already, I suggest re-using them in the new site. Agreed. I haven't yet figured out how to make certain things change programmatically, based on directory structure, so at present, logos would have to be manually added to each sub project's pages. I'm *hoping* that's not what will be required. >> - have a solution for non-HTML stuff (Batik demo, javadoc, etc.) >> - fix styling of Compliance.html (perhaps using jQuery to style items >> in table w innerHTML = 'yes'?) >> - improve page title rendering > > Yes I would like it be a little larger/bolder. Hehe... Yeah! I'm not a designer. ;-) >> Once we are ready to actually deploy, there are other issues: >> - sync page updates (status, faqs, etc.) >> - determine Ideal location from which to deploy (perhaps where it is >> in xmlgraphics/site/trunk) > > Also we need a page that documents the process of making website updates and > re-deploying. Hopefully it will be a lot simpler using the CMS approach. I can work on that. You're right! It's pretty easy! >> NOTE: I don't think we need to spend *hours* on the Compliance table >> issue--I think I can handle it via jQuery. >> >> Kind regards, > > Thanks, > > Chris I'm going on holiday for the weekend shortly, but will take this up when I return. Cheers! Web Maestro Clay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
