While I was merging the FOP branch I suddenly remembered that there were changes also to XGC.
Strictly speaking I should have launched a vote on general@ to approve the merge of the XGC part. But since I was already in the middle of the merge process and that process is fairly complicated (involving many manipulations behind the scenes to keep our private branches in sync), I didn’t want to stop, launch the vote, and restart later, and loose track of what I was doing where and why. Since the FOP branch depends on the XGC changes anyway, one could assume that approving the merge of the FOP branch implicitly meant to approve that of the XGC branch. Please shout if you believe this is twisting the Apache policy too much, and we’ll see what we can do. Vincent On 22/06/12 11:50, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > We have 7 +1, the vote passes. > > I’ll proceed with the merge within the next few days. > > Thanks, > Vincent > > > On 15/06/12 11:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the >> Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some >> clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4). >> >> We have been using the code from this branch for quite a while now and >> it has proven to work reasonably well. I won’t hide the fact that some >> parts of the code are truly ugly (in PSFontUtils mainly), but it’s not >> possible to clean that up without heavily refactoring the font >> sub-system, which I unfortunately can’t spend time on right now. At >> least the ugliness is fairly self-contained. Meanwhile some users may >> find the additional functionality useful. >> >> So I’d like to propose a vote for merging that branch back to Trunk. The >> vote will run until Thursday 21st, 8:00GMT. >> >> Here’s my +1. >> >> Thanks, >> Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
