> On 30/06/12 11:36, Glenn Adams wrote: >>> Yes, I already plan to do this before cutting the final RC1 binaries, >>> which I expect to do tomorrow (01JUL). >> >> The RC1 was meant to be frozen as soon as the vote was launched, since >> we voted on signed artefacts corresponding to a precise version of the >> repository. >> >> Any further change shall trigger a new vote, so I would leave this one >> for the final release (or possibly an RC2). >> >> That is, according to my understanding of the release process... >> > > ok that's fine, i will defer subsequent changes to the final 1.1 release > (or an RC2 if it should be required)
I would think any new functionality would necessitate a new RC (unless we want a 1.1.1 if there are bugs... ;-)
