I guess the vote will be re-launched following the implementation of the proposed changes, so I’ll defer mine for now.
A few things I noticed: • The vote should be launched against a tagged version of the tree, so that we can easily verify the artefact signatures and all know what we are talking about. A tag for XGC should be created first, and the jar resulting from a build of that tag be put in FOP’s lib directory, and then the tag for FOP can be created. • The download page on the website still refers to ‘This Candidate Release’ and FOP 1.0 as the ‘Latest Stable Release’. • The compiling page mentions Java 1.4 as a minimum requirement, instead of Java 1.5 Vincent On 05/10/12 14:07, Glenn Adams wrote: > I have posted images for final releases of XGC 1.5 and FOP 1.1 at [1] > and [2], respectively. I would like to initiate a 3-day vote on > publishing these releases. > > If I see no negative vote and no comment remains unresolved by OCT11 > 0800Z, then I will publish to the appropriate sites on OCT15. > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/xmlgraphics-commons-1_5/ > [2] http://people.apache.org/~gadams/candidates/fop-1_1/ > > The only changes made to these images from the respective RC1 images are: > > > - update documentation to reflect final version numbers > - update fop/README to simplify and extend summary of feature > changes (per Vincent's suggestion at [3]) > - update fop/xmlgraphics-fop-pom-template.xml to sync avalon > version with the version in fop/lib (i.e., 4.2.0, not 4.3.1) > - update fop/build.xml to add release-dist and related targets, > update maven-artifacts target to match xgc build usage > > [3] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-general/201206.mbox/%[email protected]%3e > > Regards, > Glenn > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
