Hi, Not sure I should sync them up as if vote for one fails I have to redo the other, I cant test maven build without publishing both, seems a mess.
Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Simon Steiner [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 March 2017 22:09 To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt) Hi, Fop and batik include each others jars so its hard to sync them up. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Adams [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 27 March 2017 21:20 To: XML Graphics Project <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt) On another point, I notice there is some naming and version discrepancies between external lib JARs included in FOP and BATIK source and binary artifacts: - FOP 2.2 has - serializer-2.7.0.jar - BATIK 1.9 has - xml-serializer-2.7.1.jar Also, batik-1.9/lib includes fop-transcoder-allinone-2.1.jar, but I would expect fop-transcoder-allinone-2.2.jar. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Glenn Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Simon Steiner < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I wanted to keep existing version naming used for past releases which >> was eg 1.8. >> > > understood; i am not going to object to this, however, we need to keep > an eye on this to see if it causes problems; we probably should have a > discussion on version policy for both dev and release processes; for > example, we now need to choose dev versions for use in upcoming work > beyond this release cycle, such as, which of the following should we > use for FOP dev builds after this release and up to the next release: > > - 2.3-SNAPSHOT > - 2.3.0-SNAPSHOT > - 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > what do others think? > > >> >> Thanks >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Glenn Adams [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 27 March 2017 19:23 >> To: XML Graphics Project <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release XML Graphics Batik 1.9 (2nd attempt) >> >> There is one significant problem remaining and possibly another as well. >> >> - Need to update batik's pom to reference XGC 2.2 as opposed to 2.1. >> - I am concerned about the abbreviated version numbers, i.e., 2.2 >> instead of 2.2.0 (for fop and xgc), and 1.9 instead of 1.9.0 (for >> batik). >> The issue is that these version numbers during the dev process >> have been >> 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT and 1.9.0-SHAPSHOT. Normally, only the "-SNAPSHOT" >> qualifier >> is removed when publishing the final version, but you have deleted the >> final ".0" incremental version component as well, which may end up >> causing >> problems. >> >> G. >> >> On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 4:29 AM, Simon Steiner < >> [email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > >> > This is a vote to release XML Graphics Batik 1.9. Only source >> > zip/tgz modified to add pom.xml's since last vote. >> > >> > >> > >> > Artifacts can be found there: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/batik-1.9/ >> > >> > >> > >> > The release is signed with the key: >> > >> > https://people.apache.org/~ssteiner/KEYS >> > >> > >> > >> > The vote will end on 31/3/2017 >> > >> > >> > >> > +1 from me. >> > >> > >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> > Version: GnuPG v1 >> > >> > >> > >> > iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJY2OlHAAoJEFuT8d98223qbOYP/18nbZYLXflhswP2XQvOcmZn >> > >> > POvUhOgBiN+U8F6vbkqhHRvT+1KyMsnLSuvNdngCAnb0BDFlIl23TlU2VzIhDcQ1 >> > >> > UUJKHElAHoOUTdvU+VXtFEfA03asJ9tEULWuWmo48Of/POjEbbdjLVPGH0Sb4uUy >> > >> > 4XLt60dY0unL77E2StFikETIgTz7pgOIFCrRe7ESxtQrzvJMLUT+kIRzDwPZhjDi >> > >> > mm68+xo4yNRCaoZT7QTlGaYKECw+AVreqDxo4LGpkXa6jUkjObUP/XSWvVHeYA3j >> > >> > i/drPrk8rBinB1IRy/sbY6bHN/hp2NxGgU8J8XM0xA6a0mN5H5fWKi0W4TdTw98y >> > >> > TvsqO/ov7XGThZmvqPIikFApM6/hDEhJMClTSX03pZDG8CzFkybmcFweKwGdoGqM >> > >> > fh98m0tUvOi9VDYguqMUdyc6vHS/YxuKg6DxwHJSjnR9BpXY3CsvniVAW791wcR5 >> > >> > dMCMHEnYWVjSvEVOTKWhOFDPQNRW+G+2prHn2yxNHRHLNQ9M+0EwJ6WsYAD1v9Hw >> > >> > 4wlq6HvLAm5BOY6mPora+QHOPwE5v7lzYUcBlxtuy53LNPrX+JZ8wGmuQLOluHww >> > >> > Rx913jG7N0MxIKtwEFK4UftZ82x7ilB/6v6tapLLij+kyQjGb7QxFxd3aq26XzTE >> > >> > ZW9GnGw1jVhdaWAWFnF6 >> > >> > =dYHK >> > >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
