Hi Jake, 

Yes, that's right. Glad that cleared it up! 

Angie 

----- "Jacob Biesinger" <[email protected]> wrote: 
> From: "Jacob Biesinger" <[email protected]> 
> To: "Angie Hinrichs" <[email protected]> 
> Cc: [email protected] 
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 10:41:02 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
> Subject: Re: [Genome] Drosophila 15 way phylogeny? 
> 
> Okay, so if I understand the pipeline, phyloFit is used to make an initial 
> estimate from a cladogram (no branch lengths). The resulting tree is fed into 
> phastCons as an initial estimate. phastCons gives estimates for conserved and 
> non-conserved branch lengths. phastCons is called repeatedly, using the 
> previous estimate for non-conserved elements as the prior estimate. 
> 
> I was under the impression that the tree input into phastCons at the first 
> iteration was obtained from an external source (i.e., using 4-fold degenerate 
> sites). Thanks for helping me clear that up. 
-- 
> Jake Biesinger 
> Graduate Student 
> Xie Lab, UC Irvine 
> (949) 231-7587 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Angie Hinrichs < [email protected] > 
> wrote: 
> 

Hi Jake, 
> 
> Our models for conserved and nonconserved sites' substitution rates are 
> estimated from bases that we were able to align across species, so right 
> there is a big source of bias towards bases that have not diverged beyond 
> recognition. The "four-fold degenerate positions" subst/site must have been 
> estimated by a different method from the trees that we feed into phastCons. 
> 
> BTW If you would like to see the "makedoc", the file is 
> kent/src/hg/makeDb/doc/dm2.txt in our source tree ( 
> http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/admin/jksrc.zip or see 
> http://genome.ucsc.edu/admin/cvs.html if you use CVS), and has all the gory 
> detail of how we generated the track. Search for the "PHASTCONS 15WAY" 
> section. 
> 
> I hope that helps, and please let us know at [email protected] if you have 
> more questions. That said, Adam Siepel (at Cornell now) created the 
> estimation methodology behind our conservation scores, so if you really want 
> to get into the finer points of the statistical basis for the estimates, he's 
> the best source. 
> 
> Angie 
> 
> 
> ----- "Jacob Biesinger" < [email protected] > wrote: 
> 
> > From: "Jacob Biesinger" < [email protected] > 
> > To: [email protected] 
> > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 5:39:52 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific 
> > Subject: [Genome] Drosophila 15 way phylogeny? 
> 


> > 
> > Hi! 
> > 
> > I've pulled up an old thread talking about the Drosophila 15-way multiz 
> > phylogeny at 
> > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/pipermail/genome/2007-January/012530.html 
> > 
> > I see the conserved and non-conserved posterior estimates, and the prior 
> > estimate from the "makedoc:" 
> > 
> > >* This is from our makedoc for the 15way Conservation: 
> > *>* 
> > *>* #TREE: 
> > *>* 
> > (((((((((dm2:0.032478,(droSim1:0.017650,droSec1:0.015740):0.017736):0.026088,(droYak2:0.058116,droEre2:0.055952):0.031922):0.084953,droAna3:0.218988):0.051563,(dp4:0.013624,droPer1:0.015374):0.210705):0.046101,droWil1:0.292357):0.019351,((droVir3:0.109131,droMoj3:0.142623):0.047595,droGri2:0.154583):0.189999):0.113599,anoGam1:0.357817):0.092848,apiMel2:0.386309):0.169225,triCas2:0.169225);
> >  
> > *>* 
> > * 
> > 
> > So this is the tree used as a prior. Although the overall topology is 
> > similar to what I've seen before (i.e., 
> > http://web.archive.org/web/20080413030437/http://rana.lbl.gov/~dan/trees.html
> >  ) 
> > I'm a bit confused because the total branch length for the tree is only ~ 
> > 3.14. According to the original 12 drosophila sequencing paper, the branch 
> > length estimated for four-fold degenerate positions was ~4.5 for the 12 
> > drosophilids alone. In this prior tree, the branch length for the 
> > drosophilids are only ~1.85. Where exactly is this phylogeny coming 
> > from? 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks! 
> > -- 
> > Jake Biesinger 
> > Graduate Student 
> > UC Irvine 
> > (949) 231-7587 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Genome maillist - [email protected] 
> > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to