Hi Jennifer, Thanks very much. Its marvelous to receive such a prompt and useful reply.
That explains it - I'm working with a set of Refseq genes I downloaded a couple of months ago and so that is how the old ID popped out. Good to know what is going on. Thanks again. :-) Cheers, Stewart On 5/02/2010, at 6:54 PM, Jennifer Jackson wrote: > Hello Stewart, > > This RefSeq has been retracted at NCBI: > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/73858558 > > The data remains as part of the UCSC Genes track as that track is > built at particular intervals, where the RefSeq (and other genbank > annotation) is updated more frequently. At the next UCSC Genes track > build, the retracted RefSeq will be removed. When you perform a > search using the identifier NM_001032290, it is the UCSC Genes track > that is returned with results, not the RefSe track. > > Hopefully this helps to explain your results when using the Table > browser, > Thanks, > Jennifer > > > ------------------------------------------------ > Jennifer Jackson > UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group > > ----- "Stewart Stevens" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> From: "Stewart Stevens" <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2010 8:30:11 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada >> Pacific >> Subject: [Genome] Missing Refseq IDs? >> >> Hi, >> >> I am using the table browser to retrieve intervals for refseq genes. >> >> (May 2006 build) >> >> My list includes this identifier which gives an alert saying it can't >> >> be found (I have tried it on its own too): >> >> NM_001032290 >> >> Strangely when I search for this in the Genome Browser interface I >> find the Refseq PSRC1 gene just fine. >> >> Maybe I'm overlooking something! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Stewart >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Genome maillist - [email protected] >> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
