Dear Collegues,
I have been started to use the UCSB database from a week trying to search a possible consensus regions for the trascriptional regulation factor (REST called also NRSF or NRSE) on KCNQ4(KQT-like 4) gene, but I'm still unable to well understand the reason why the consensus regions find using UCSB database on this gene are mostly different from the canonical ones described in scientific literature. Can you give me some technical advice to avoid this gap? Region Investigated: KCNQ4(KQT-like 4) gene in mouse Chr 4 T.F.: REST C.R.: nnCACGACCnn(nnnn)GGACAGnnnC Thanks a lot in advance for your help. Sincerely Fabio Arturo Iannotti PhD Dpt. of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior University of California Life Science Building 95616 Davis CA USA _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
