Hi Aaron,

Thank you for sending more detail. This is being added to the 
development queue for prioritization.

We appreciate your input!

Jen
UCSC Genome Browser Support

On 7/10/10 10:55 PM, Aaron Wenger wrote:
> Hiram et al - By that I mean a BED track that obtains data from multiple
> tables, with the option to turn certain tables on or off from the track
> configuration page.  For example, all of the "peak" subtracks from the
> Yale TFBS supertrack would be displayed as if they were all loaded as a
> single track, without each subtrack always claiming a line of space.
> The Yale TFBS is probably the best example to me.  It has ChIP-seq data
> for tens of factors, most of which do not have binding sites at a given
> locus.  Yet, if I want to see all the different TFs, the subtracks
> always claim tens of lines of vertical space.  I'd like to display the
> data as if it were a single track drawn from the separate database
> tables.  Jim Kent presented essentially that idea on slide 18 of his
> presentation at
> http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~kent/presentations/encodeDc2010.pdf.
>
> I appreciate the help.
>
> Aaron
>
> On 7/10/2010 4:34 PM, Hiram Clawson wrote:
>> What would a multi bed type of track look like ?
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Aaron Wenger"<[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2010 3:09:33 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
>> Subject: Re: [Genome] [Genome-mirror] "Combined" composite tracks
>>
>> Pauline - Thank you for the reply.
>>
>> It's good to see the feature available for wiggle tracks, but I'm
>> primarily interested in a "multiBed" type track.  Does that exist?  If
>> not, are there plans to develop it?
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Aaron
>>
>> On 7/9/2010 5:54 PM, Pauline Fujita wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Aaron,
>>>
>>> This is still a feature in development but is almost ready for
>>> release. In fact the first tracks to use this feature will be under
>>> quality assurance review shortly.
>>>
>>> For the first releases this won't be something you can do with a
>>> custom track but will be possible if you are running a mirror. Here is
>>> a sample of the trackDb.ra entries that are needed for these first
>>> releases:
>>>
>>>       track wgEncodeRegTxn
>>>       container multiWig
>>>       noInherit on
>>>       type wig 0.00 2716.04
>>>       superTrack wgEncodeReg hide
>>>       shortLabel Transcription
>>>       longLabel Transcription levels assayed by RNA-seq from ENCODE
>>>       release alpha
>>>       configurable on
>>>       visibility full
>>>       maxHeightPixels 100:30:11
>>>       showSubtrackColorOnUi on
>>>       aggregate transparentOverlay
>>>       transformFunc LOG
>>>       viewLimits 0:4
>>>       priority 1
>>>
>>>           track wgEncodeRegTxnGm12878
>>>           table
>>> wgEncodeCaltechRnaSeqRawSignalRep1Gm12878CellLongpolyaBb12x75
>>>           shortLabel Gm12878
>>>           longLabel Transcription of Gm12878 cells from ENCODE
>>>           release alpha
>>>           parent wgEncodeRegTxn
>>>           type wig 0.00 2446.53
>>>           color 255,128,128
>>>
>>>           track wgEncodeRegTxnH1hesc
>>>           table wgEncodeCaltechRnaSeqRawSignalRep1H1hescCellPapBb2R2x75
>>>           shortLabel H1 ES
>>>           longLabel Transcription of H1 ES cells from ENCODE
>>>           release alpha
>>>           parent wgEncodeRegTxn
>>>           type wig 0.00 3686.36
>>>           color 255,212,128
>>>
>>> Note that the key new tags here are "container multiWig" and
>>> "aggregate transparentOverlay" in the parent track.  You don't need to
>>> do anything different on the wigs that make up the subtrack.  The
>>> "table" tag is new.  It lets you use the same table in multiple tracks
>>> among other things.  I think if you've got the latest released binary
>>> CGIs they'll silently support this already.
>>>
>>> Hopefully this information was helpful and answers your question. If
>>> you have further questions or require clarification feel free to
>>> contact the mailing list at [email protected].
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Pauline Fujita
>>> UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group
>>> http://genome.ucsc.edu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/02/10 14:54, Aaron Wenger wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Does the "combined" subtrack feature that is featured on slide 18 of
>>>> Jim Kent's presentation at
>>>> http://users.soe.ucsc.edu/~kent/presentations/encodeDc2010.pdf online
>>>> yet, or is it still future work?  I have a number of subtracks that
>>>> are sparse, which means that I have a lot of empty lines just eating
>>>> up vertical space.  The combined feature is exactly what I need.  If
>>>> it's not available, do you have any suggestions on other ways for me
>>>> to achieve that effect?  Is there somewhere I could add a custom
>>>> track handler?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Aaron
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Genome-mirror mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome-mirror
>>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
>> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to