Hello Maxel, You are correct, this is an error. We have known about it for some time and have decided to not fix the legacy data.
A better option (even in the absence of an error) would be to use the newest conservation data which is a 44-way. This data is formatted slightly differently in the Assembly browser track controls - all related tracks are combined into a single composite track called "Conservation". Click on the track's name to view the components, display controls, and methods. The sub-track component analogous to the one you mention is called "Element Conservation (phastCons)". In the Table browser, the data is in the table called: phastCons44way. The entire dataset is also available by ftp from our Downloads server. If you find anything else strange please let us know. All feedback is appreciated, Jennifer Jackson UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group mx qian wrote: > hei,In the process of my study, I found a mistake in the table browser with > the phastcons28-way database. > clade: Mammal > genome: human > assembly: Mar.2006 > group: Comparative Genomics > track: 28-Way Cons > table: phastcons28way > > In such two chrome position, phastcons have two scores: > chr4 90000001 > chr10 100000001 > I think they are abnormal.Maybe, you can fix it. > > yours, > Maxel Qian > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome > _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
