Thanks for reverting back Brooke. Here is the link of the original dataset 
(Human U133A + GNF1H (gcRMA-condensed) GeneAtlas (7M)):

http://wombat.gnf.org/downloads/gnf1h,gcrma.zip or can be navigated from the 
main page: http://wombat.gnf.org/index.html

In addition to my previous question, I don't quite understand what exact 
operations UCSC-GB has done to transform the original GNF data (in record #1 
below) to various other forms (records #2, #3, #4 below) (for clarity I am 
copying the records again):

1. From GNF (Novartis) site (one value for each of the 79 tissues (probably 
avergaed over the two measurement?) - looks like raw scores?)
208553_at 8.3 6.3 6.55 5.35 6.35 6.55 5.1 8.05 6.4 6.9 7.8 7.75 9.8 8.85 8.35 8 
8.9 7.35 7.8 9.65 5.55 6.85 5 5.1 6.05 6.7 4.6 6.7 6.75 5.7 5.9 5.4 6.5 7.15 
4.8 8.1 6.5 6.45 6.5 7.65 5.9 8.2 8.75 6.15 5.75 5.35 4.45 4.95 7 6.45 7.4 6.8 
6.2 7.65 7.4 5.9 6.9 5.4 7.65 6.65 6.4 5.7 6.05 6.25 5.3 6.65 5.65 5.95 6.15 
6.8 7.65 6.45 6.75 5.6 5.6 7.1 5.65 6.95 5.6

2. UCSC Table: gnfHumanAtlas2All (2 measurements each in 79 tissues)
208553_at 158 
38,15,27,48,201,25,361,23,156,491,383,420,49,328,76,68,664,406,330,139,331,224,58,42,217,53,62,28,38,23,25,100,324,191,53,30,29,49,15,56,67,29,96,72,93,54,25,34,110,81,118,24,38,25,25,69,17,15,82,36,59,32,13,55,22,29,76,70,16,32,120,29,208,18,86,37,26,42,31,23,48,24,30,38,66,48,63,45,53,68,31,30,38,44,59,28,22,31,38,95,25,26,34,21,18,85,58,29,17,28,17,38,35,13,75,81,47,23,253,23,55,131,88,18,82,18,24,46,40,95,19,61,16,32,60,28,24,91,19,79,29,50,47,53,29,68,55,34,110,60,69,108,26,43,23,22,72,83,

3. UCSC Table: gnfHumanAtlas2AllRatio (2 measurements each in 79 tissues)
208553_at 158
 
-0.291,-2.217,-0.784,0.046,2.112,-0.895,2.957,-1.016,1.746,3.400,3.042,3.175,0.076,2.818,0.709,0.548,3.836,3.126,2.827,1.580,2.832,2.268,0.319,-0.147,2.222,0.189,0.415,-0.732,-0.291,-1.016,-0.895,1.105,2.801,2.038,0.189,-0.632,-0.681,0.076,-2.217,0.268,0.527,-0.681,1.046,0.631,1.000,0.216,-0.895,-0.452,1.242,0.801,1.343,-0.954,-0.291,-0.895,-0.895,0.569,-2.217,-2.217,0.818,-0.369,0.343,-0.539,-2.217,0.242,-1.080,-0.681,0.709,0.590,-2.217,-0.539,1.368,-0.681,2.161,-2.217,0.887,-0.330,-0.839,-0.147,-0.585,-1.016,0.046,-0.954,-0.632,-0.291,0.505,0.046,0.438,-0.047,0.189,0.548,-0.585,-0.632,-0.291,-0.080,0.343,-0.732,-1.080,-0.585,-0.291,1.031,-0.895,-0.839,-0.452,-1.147,-2.217,0.870,0.319,-0.681,-2.217,-0.732,-2.217,-0.291,-0.410,-2.217,0.690,0.801,0.015,-1.016,2.444,-1.016,0.242,1.494,0.920,-2.217,0.818,-2.217,-0.954,-0.016,-0.217,1.031,-2.217,0.392,-2.217,-0.539,0.368,-0.732,-0.954,0.969,-2.217,0.765,-0.681,0.105,0.015,0.189,-0.681,0.548,0.242,-0.452,1.
242,0.368,0.569,1.216,-0.839,-0.113,-1.016,-1.080,0.631,0.836,

4. UCSC Table: gnfAtlas2 (one value for each of the 79 tissues (probably 
averaged over the two measurements in the same tissue))
785 chr6 26264597 26265257 208553_at 998 + 26264597 26265257 0 1 660, 0, 79 
0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,
 
-0.454000,-2.217000,-0.673000,0.224000,0.649000,-0.881000,0.278000,-0.593000,0.195000,-0.988000,-1.378000,0.344000,-0.028000,-0.163000,1.022000,-1.048000,-0.493000,-0.098000,-0.800000,-0.726000,-0.288000,-0.105000,-0.067000,-0.222000,-0.303000,-0.975000,0.608000,0.839000,0.609000,2.204000,2.550000,-0.369000,2.573000,0.970000,3.108000,1.447000,0.629000,3.481000,0.086000,1.206000,-0.159000,-0.653000,0.105000,2.420000,-1.254000,-0.182000,0.008000,-1.254000,0.370000,-0.833000,0.734000,-0.462000,-0.913000,-0.185000,-0.485000,-1.314000,0.746000,0.102000,0.196000,-0.673000,0.805000,-0.476000,-0.181000,-0.194000,0.892000,0.407000,-1.474000,-0.867000,0.276000,-0.609000,-0.077000,0.369000,-0.799000,-0.501000,0.714000,0.868000,-0.649000,-0.700000,-1.378000,

Thanks a lot,

Raj



--- On Thu, 6/11/09, Brooke Rhead <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: Brooke Rhead <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Genome] GNF Atlas 2 data
> To: "Raj" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Date: Thursday, June 11, 2009, 12:30 AM
> Hello Raj,
> 
> Can you please point me to the location of the gene
> expression record on the GNF site?
> 
> --
> Brooke Rhead
> UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group
> 
> 
> On 06/10/09 10:33, Raj wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Below are two gene expression records representing the
> same probe.
> However, the UCSC website record (shown below as record 1)
> is completely
> different from the original GNF website record (shown below
> as record
> 2). The two record values appear to be raw form. Looking at
> this data,
> the probe appears to be expressing in the UCSC record,
> while it is not
> in the GNF record.
> > 
> > Can somebody explain why there is this discrepancy?
> > 
> > 1. UCSC Table:
> > clade: Mammal
> > genome: Human
> > assembly: Mar. 2006
> > group: Expression
> > track: GNF Atlas 2
> > table: gnfHumanAtlas2All
> > 208553_at    158   
> 38,15,27,48,201,25,361,23,156,491,383,420,49,328,76,68,664,406,330,139,331,224,58,42,217,53,62,28,38,23,25,100,324,191,53,30,29,49,15,56,67,29,96,72,93,54,25,34,110,81,118,24,38,25,25,69,17,15,82,36,59,32,13,55,22,29,76,70,16,32,120,29,208,18,86,37,26,42,31,23,48,24,30,38,66,48,63,45,53,68,31,30,38,44,59,28,22,31,38,95,25,26,34,21,18,85,58,29,17,28,17,38,35,13,75,81,47,23,253,23,55,131,88,18,82,18,24,46,40,95,19,61,16,32,60,28,24,91,19,79,29,50,47,53,29,68,55,34,110,60,69,108,26,43,23,22,72,83,
> > 
> > 
> > 2. From GNF (Novartis) site
> > 208553_at    8.3   
> 6.3    6.55   
> 5.35    6.35   
> 6.55    5.1   
> 8.05    6.4   
> 6.9    7.8   
> 7.75    9.8   
> 8.85    8.35   
> 8    8.9   
> 7.35    7.8   
> 9.65    5.55   
> 6.85    5   
> 5.1    6.05   
> 6.7    4.6   
> 6.7    6.75   
> 5.7    5.9   
> 5.4    6.5   
> 7.15    4.8   
> 8.1    6.5   
> 6.45    6.5   
> 7.65    5.9   
> 8.2    8.75   
> 6.15    5.75   
> 5.35    4.45   
> 4.95    7   
> 6.45    7.4   
> 6.8    6.2   
> 7.65    7.4   
> 5.9    6.9   
> 5.4    7.65   
> 6.65    6.4   
> 5.7    6.05   
> 6.25    5.3   
> 6.65    5.65   
> 5.95    6.15   
> 6.8    7.65   
> 6.45    6.75   
> 5.6    5.6   
> 7.1    5.65   
> 6.95    5.6
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Raj
> > 
> > 
> >   
>    _______________________________________________
> > Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
> > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
> 


      

_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to