Hello, Philip,

I believe that your observation about the resolution of the
FISH method gets to the core of the issue.  These days we obtain
the locations of the cytoBands from NCBI.  The description of how
the bands were determined is at the bottom of the details page for
the cytoBands track:

http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgc?db=hg18&o=160900000&t=164400000&g=cytoBand&i=q26

The track was built using BAC clones, but it is still a FISH
experiment and the resolution is limited by the microscopy.

I would not put too much faith in the exact basepair used as the
breakpoint between bands.  Some specific value must be chosen
for the software to display, but you can see what level of
confidence to have in the endpoints when you look at the details
for 6p26:

Item: q26
Position: chr6:160900001-164400000
Band: 6q26
Genomic Size: 3500000

In fact, the entire table is mapped only to 100-kb resolution,
approximately the size of the LPA gene.

If the actual gene has been FISH-mapped to 6p26 (&/or 27), especially
if it has been reported more than once, then that seems to me to be a
better estimation of the location.

best wishes and thanks for being a Browser user,

                        --b0b kuhn
                        ucsc genome bioinformatics group

On 1/19/2012 4:14 AM, Philip Haycock wrote:
> Hello
> 
> I am trying to clarify the chromosomal location of my gene of interest
> - the lipoprotein A (LPA) gene, which is located at
> chr6:160,872,505-161,007,397 (h18). The gene appears to straddle
> 6q25.3 and 6q26. However, when the gene was originally mapped, in 1988
> using cDNA probes, it was mapped to 6q26-27 (Hum Genet (1988)
> 79:352-356). Apparently the cDNA probes mapped most intensely to q26
> and q27 but binding was also observed at q25.3. So, I´m assuming that
> their resolution was poorer than whatever method is used by UCSC for
> their chromosomal band information?  In every paper I read about this
> gene, the location is given as 6q26-27, so I´m not sure which band
> position I should cite - the one given by UCSC or by the paper that
> mapped the gene? Do you know why there is a discrepancy?
> 
> Name of assembly: hg18
> Track: chromosomal band
> Location: chr6:160,872,505-161,007,397
> 
> Many thanks for your kind assistance!
> 
> 
> Regards
> Philip
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to