Good afternoon Hiram, Thanks for your answer. I'll do the tests late tonight or tomorrow.
I would like to ask: Will the hgWiggle command work through an ODBC connection? Elaborating a little bit more: I really don't want to download huge files to my pc, just the results for the position I query. Kent's source is really great, but to be able to use it on my environment I'll have to rewrite tons of things, which is like reinventing the wheel. Also if I install cygwin some programs I use get messy (i.e. Ruby). For those reasons I would like to stick with the table browser. Is simple, you already did the hard work and I don't have to worry about file extensions/types. On the other hand through ODBC I can query all primary tables by position but not wigData files (they just contain an hyperlink) So, this string hgWiggle -db=ce6 -chr=chrI -doStats gc5Base Will work though ODBC? All the best and as always many thanks. Diego El día 12 de marzo de 2012 15:46, Hiram Clawson <[email protected]> escribió: > Good Afternoon Diego: > > You may find it more convenient to work with these tables > from command line operations at your site. You can use > the public MySQL server with the downloaded .wib files > for ordinary wiggle tracks: > http://genomewiki.ucsc.edu/index.php/Using_hgWiggle_without_a_database > > And any track with a bigWig type can be used with its URL > to the hgdownload server. > > With the command line commands you can format the wiggle data > in any of the available formats. > > --Hiram > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Diego Pereira" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 2:25:17 AM > Subject: [Genome] Format request > > Good morning, > I've been working with several tables at the table browser, and I've > found really difficult and time consuming to automatize the > organization of my results due the format they are displayed. > This happens mainly with the results of wigData. > However, by using the Kent's source I found that using the > bigWigToBedGraph utility most of the results (at least those I have > tried) are displayed uniformly with a format consistent with those > retrieved from primary tables. > I believe it can be great that the default way for displaying the > results at the table browser were in this format. > Of course I don't know how difficult it can be to do this, or if there > are some reasons that not allow this shift in formatting. > In that case please accept my apologies. > Anyway, is just an idea that will probably help many people in > spending less time in the organization of their results . > All the best, > Diego _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
