Hello Steve, Thank you very much for your answer. All the best, Diego
El día 13 de marzo de 2012 15:26, Steve Heitner <[email protected]> escribió: > Hello, Diego. > > In our ENCODE tracks, older tables often get revoked in favor of new tables > when the data in them becomes obsolete or otherwise incorrect. These older > tables still exist and show up in the "All Tables" list, but will not show > up under the individual track listings in the Table Browser. For some > non-ENCODE tracks such as the RefSeq Genes track, there are many supporting > tables that are necessary, but not directly linked to the main table. > Again, tables such as these will show up in the "All Tables" list, but not > under the individual track listings. Examples such as these explain why the > "All Tables" count does not exactly match the count of tables listed in the > individual tracks. > > Please contact us again at [email protected] if you have any further > questions. > > --- > Steve Heitner > UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Diego Pereira > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Genome] Tables, tracks and groups in the table browser > > Dear all, > While comparing the hg19 tables, tracks and groups contained at the table > browser I found some slight differences in tables numbers that called my > attention. > Under the track "alltables" there are 7524 tables. > However, the total ammount of tables in all the other tracks (excluding the > "alltracks" track of course) is 6900. > By reviewing the names of the tables that are not included under the other > tracks, I found that aprox 440 are wgEncode tables that should be present in > other tracks. > I checked the last email sent by Kate Rosenbloom to see wheter the reason > for this was related with the categorization of the new releases, but that > was not the case. > The wgEncode tables not included under a specific track > (theoretically) belong to different groups including expression and > regulation. > Therefore, I would like to ask, what is the reason they are not included in > specific groups or tracks? > I can send you the list upon your request. > Regards, > Diego > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome > _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
