Bringing back an old thread, I've still been able to test the brltty service script with system, mainly because I'm still fighting with getting system working.
Before I post to the Gentoo user forums, anyone have any good suggestions on why my initramfs wouldn't be activating my LVM volumes? I'm running LVM on top of a software raid. Root and boot are on their own raid partitions. The raid partition with my LVM volume group seems to get started by my initramfs, but the volume groups don't get activated. And, of course, /usr is an LVM partition. The initramfs was built with the latest stable version of genkernel-next. It does contain LVM support. If I set real_init to /usr/lib/system/system, it complains that it can't find that on my root partition. If I let the initramfs call the old-style init, the LVM volumes are detected and activated, and of course mounted, after the hand-off. I'm seriously considering moving /usr, /var and /tmp to my root partition to avoid this madness. I was planning to post to the forums since I haven't yet seen anyone out there having this problem and I assume I'm overlooking something obvious. But I figured I'd ask here first just in case. I know this is rather off-topic, but if I can get this working, I can see how brltty and system work with the recommended service config Chris provided. Thanks, Keith -----Original Message----- From: Chris Brannon [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 11:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [gentoo-accessibility] Brltty and systemd? "Keith Wessel" <[email protected]> writes: > Are there any plans to add a system service script to the brltty > ebuild? I don't mind adding it, but I'm not really in a position to test it. Here's the one that Arch uses: https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/plain/trunk/brltty.serv ice?h=packages/brltty I can add that one if it works for you. If you have something that works better, please send it, and I'll add that instead. Also we need a systemd service for espeakup. I think someone was going to test the one from Arch, but I don't remember whether they ever did. I'll look through my list archives... Anyway, hopefully we'll have .service files for both very soon. -- Chris
