-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daniel Gryniewicz wrote:
> 
> The big reason would be because gcc 3.3.x (the stable compiler on x86)
> doesn't support it.  It has a patch that adds the option to gcc, but it
> does nothing.  Until x86 is on 3.4.x by default, you can't expect full
> support for stack-protector.
> 

I hadn't even realized that.  And I thought that amd64 tended to lag
behind!  As I recall 3.4 had quite a few benefits, as I normally don't
tend to run bleeding-edge...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDRU3Hg2bN8aFizRkRAgzWAJ9J0wAcyVvosuIhzHFHhO5UPA+I+ACeL41I
hTY4arjzkupPDunP0ZQUjHE=
=Pqju
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to