Ok, so I compiled a new kernel, and it seemed to work. I booted the new
kernel, I was able to unzip and install dhcpcd, ndiswrapper, wireless-tools,
and cab extract. Then, once the wireless was working, I tried emerge
--search dhcpcd, because gentoo apparently doesn't like my manually
configured dhcpcd.... CRASH! I ran memtest86+, as suggested, and it got to
at least 30% without a failure. I'll try it again, but at least 30% of my
memory is in tact. I'll try to emerge some other things, and see how it
goes.

-Peter

On 5/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:04:30AM -0400, Peter Davoust wrote:
>    Ok, first, while I appreciate your advice, this is a brand new laptop
>    and there's no way I'm running bonnie++ (that's prime95, right?), or
>    anything with the words "cpu" and "burn" in the same sentence on this
>    thing. Memtest86 might be an option as long as it has no potential to
>    kill anything. I agree, it could be the heat, and that was the first
>    thing that came to my mind, but Vista boots and runs for long periods
>    of time with no issues. I'll check it out with the new kernel in the
>    morning and see what it does.

Any new laptop should have the hardware smarts not to smoke itself, or
something really is broken.  It may shut down "unexpectedly" (which I
also consider a design bug), but actually causing damage is unlikely.

That said, this really sounds like a RAM problem, so I would run
memtest86 first.  Memtest86 has zero chance of smoking any system that
has passed a factory QA check.

I had a Gentoo system (a server) that pretty much ran (to be honest, it
was a heavily used database server that stayed up for a good 3 months in
this state).  However, its clock was skewed something like 10m/hour (I
now think this was due to lost ticks during processing of memory
faults).

I tried all the various kernel flags, largemem, etc., only to find out
that the problem was (as others on this thread have posted) incompatible
RAM.  I point this out only to say that bad RAM can cause *very* unusual
problems (not just the segfaults you'd expect), and to say that lots of
complex operations (like Vista, for example) can continue to run just
fine in such a broken environment.

Dustin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list


Reply via email to