On Freitag, 18. Mai 2007, Peter Humphrey wrote: > It's just occurred to me to question this kernel configuration option, > which is under Processor Type and Features. > > We used to have to choose from 100, 250 and 1000 Hz, but recently 300 Hz > has been added, with the following Help text: > > ---- > CONFIG_HZ_300: > 300 Hz is a good compromise choice allowing server performance while also > showing good interactive responsiveness even on SMP and NUMA systems and > exactly dividing by both PAL and NTSC frame rates for video and multimedia > work. > ---- > > At first I followed the advice without thought, but on reflection it occurs > to me to wonder about the truth of this statement. I suspect it's only true > in North America, northern Japan and a few other places, where the public > supply frequency is 60 Hz. In the rest of the world, with its 50 Hz, I > think 250 would be a better choice.
and 300 is not dividable by 50? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
