Well, my system is uptime since for a long time and has many updates
more than I belive!,, :D 
For the moments is running well, I dont be a freek of gentoo but when I
buy the amd64 system I had to make something hard step's to startit,
perhaps it's not something clean and it's has profiles to the pass.
I go to think in change this profile, or it reinstall from scratch ( is
more fastest but the less interesting :( )
 
Thank's and regards

El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 09:56 +0000, Beso escribió:
> i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a real
> gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1
> makes me wonder if you really know what you're doing...
> someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest
> profile.
> i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect
> profile to do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months)
> and then compile at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then
> you could use gcc-4.2.2 and other things the way you want. i
> personally use a lot of unstable stuff, but the base system is amd64
> and not ~amd64. 
> 
> 2008/1/29, agtdino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>         Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to
>         2.6.23-r6.
>         
>         Regard's
>         
>         El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski
>         escribió:
>         > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote:
>         > > Hi,
>         > Hi!
>         >
>         > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently
>         incompatible (well
>         > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper
>         fix) with
>         > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will
>         need to
>         > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a
>         release
>         > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two
>         patches) that is
>         > compatible with 2.6.24.
>         >
>         > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely
>         necessary, I
>         > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6
>         >
>         > -- Steev
>         >
>         
>         --
>         [email protected] mailing list
>         
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> dott. ing. beso

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to