On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Mark Knecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted > > below, on Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:21:51 -0800: > > > > > > > I'm not finding confcache or anything that's the obvious right choice on > > > that one. I'll emerge ccache though. > > > > Yeah... confcache was an experiment that has been shelved for the time > > being. > > <SNIP> > > > > > > For people who'd prefer to have portage "just work" with the least > > hassle, even if it takes a bit longer on some packages, confcache is > > definitely something you want to leave alone, at least for now. Maybe > > someday... > > > > -- > > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > > Thanks Duncan. Can you suggest what I minimally need to change to get > good backtrace data out of Wine. I've added ccache, run the command > ccache -M 2G and rebuilt Wine at this point. Just figured I could do > that in the background while I Waited for someone more experience like > you to come along and tell me the right way to do it. > > Thanks, > Mark > Sorry. Also added
FEATURES="parallel-fetch distclean ccache confcache splitdebug" to make.conf -- [email protected] mailing list
