On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Barry Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann <[email protected]> skribis: >> ok, I tried ekopath: >> >> UCBFAIL indicates problems! >> /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in COS(X) at line 444 for >> generic >> /tmp/usbtest/cexp_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in EXP(X) at line 444 for >> generic >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in ceild at line 701 for double >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in coshd at line 701 for double >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in floord at line 701 for double >> /tmp/usbtest/clib_DP.output:UCBFAIL clib_DP.output , 25 out of 25 tests >> completed >> /tmp/usbtest/csin_DP.output: ucbtest UCBFAIL in SIN(X) at line 444 for >> generic >> >> only 10 out of 14 show UCBPASS! > > That must be what they mean by "Industry proven robustness and > quality"
Do you have any info about _any_ system passing this 100% successfully? What about that the code itself might have a bug in it? - Mark
