On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:53:23PM -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> > Wouldn't disabling the use of binary packages during the seed stage
> > update fix this?
> > 
> > 
> I'm not sure I'd call rebuilding it every time a "fix" when you just
> rejected deleting the bad packages and rebuilding ONCE.
> 
> As I said, the only proper fix is to update the toolchain to EAPI5.  We
> could live in the dark ages forever, but I really don't think it helps
> anyone.

I'd be quite happy to have to toolchain move to EAPI5.  I suspect we
need an interim solution until that happens ;).

I also don't think EAPI5 sub-slots fix this problem, since GCC
wouldn't RDEPEND on a particular sub-slot of mpc, even if both
packages used EAPI5.  RDEPEND describes potential source
compatability, but we need to record the actual ABI linkage (which is
a subset of the source compatability).

Cheers,
Trevor

-- 
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to