commit:     8796eb11ef7d7103d079813822f2f5579038e6bc
Author:     Kent Fredric <kentnl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Mon Oct 19 07:06:30 2020 +0000
Commit:     Kent Fredric <kentnl <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Mon Oct 19 07:09:17 2020 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=8796eb11

dev-libs/nettle: 3.6-r3 keyword ~m68k re bug #749657

Full test compliment performed under qemu-m68k chroot, and its
incredibly unlikely somebody will ever do this natively due to the
time it will take.

Required as a dependency of @system even on ultra-minimal no-config
installs, as a result of sys-apps/portage[rsync-verify] defaulting
to enabled.

sys-apps/portage w/ USE=rsync-verify (default)
|- app-portage/gemato
|  - app-crypt/gnupg
|- app-crypt/gnupg w/ USE=ssl (linux/make.defaults,required)
   - net-libs/gnutls
    - dev-libs/nettle

It also gets pulled via perl

dev-lang/perl w/ USE=-minimal (default)
 - app-admin/perl-cleaner
  - app-portage/portage-utils w/ USE=qmanifest (default)
   - app-crypt/gpgme
    - app-crypt/gnupg w/ USE="ssl" (optional)
     - net-libs/gnutls
      - dev-libs/nettle

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/749657
Package-Manager: Portage-3.0.8, Repoman-3.0.1
Signed-off-by: Kent Fredric <kentnl <AT> gentoo.org>

 dev-libs/nettle/nettle-3.6-r3.ebuild | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/dev-libs/nettle/nettle-3.6-r3.ebuild 
b/dev-libs/nettle/nettle-3.6-r3.ebuild
index be9492fe444..a09c279122e 100644
--- a/dev-libs/nettle/nettle-3.6-r3.ebuild
+++ b/dev-libs/nettle/nettle-3.6-r3.ebuild
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ SRC_URI="mirror://gnu/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz"
 
 LICENSE="|| ( LGPL-3 LGPL-2.1 )"
 SLOT="0/8-6" # subslot = libnettle - libhogweed soname version
-KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv ~s390 
~sparc ~x86"
+KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~hppa ~ia64 ~m68k ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~riscv 
~s390 ~sparc ~x86"
 IUSE="+asm doc +gmp static-libs test cpu_flags_x86_aes cpu_flags_arm_neon 
cpu_flags_x86_sha"
 RESTRICT="!test? ( test )"
 

Reply via email to