commit:     e0e93c981baef4a697dac91e8a9efed0a4a204b5
Author:     Mike Gilbert <floppym <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
AuthorDate: Tue Feb  6 19:26:29 2024 +0000
Commit:     Mike Gilbert <floppym <AT> gentoo <DOT> org>
CommitDate: Tue Feb  6 19:26:29 2024 +0000
URL:        https://gitweb.gentoo.org/data/gentoo-news.git/commit/?id=e0e93c98

2024-02-01-grub-upgrades: x86_64-pc -> x86_64-efi

Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert <floppym <AT> gentoo.org>

 2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt 
b/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt
index f7aaa72..ddcc224 100644
--- a/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt
+++ b/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades/2024-02-01-grub-upgrades.en.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Title: GRUB upgrades
 Author: Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org>
 Posted: 2024-02-01
-Revision: 1
+Revision: 2
 News-Item-Format: 2.0
 Display-If-Installed: sys-boot/grub
 
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ a stale core image to exist. For example:
 
 /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI (grub 2.06 core image)
 /boot/efi/EFI/gentoo/grubx64.efi (grub 2.12 core image)
-/boot/grub/x86_64-pc/*.mod (grub 2.12 modules)
+/boot/grub/x86_64-efi/*.mod (grub 2.12 modules)
 
 Booting this system using BOOTX64.EFI image would likely fail due to a
 symbol mismatch between the core image and modules. [1]

Reply via email to