On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 10:31:41PM -0800, C. Brewer wrote:
Content-Description: signed data
> On Sunday 02 November 2003 7:45, Jon Portnoy wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 07:33:10PM -0800, C. Brewer wrote:
> > Content-Description: signed data
> >
> > > Is it me, or does it seem like when there are less than popular
> > > suggestions, there are often more nasty replies or flame-tinted repsonses
> > > from the developers, or am I just overly sensitive?
> >
> > I can put a "Opinions are my own and not those of Gentoo Linux or any
> > other entity unless stated otherwise" disclaimer in my sig like I do on
> > the forums if it's necessary.
>
> Being not the first time I've heard something along these lines, forgive me if
> I am slightly skeptical. Opinions are your own, regardless of if they
> coincide with Gentoo's. But as a person who is entitled to any opinion, nasty
> or otherwise, while yet still at least partly responsible for steering the
> distibution... where does the line get drawn? Do we take nasty responses as
> merely personal opinion until a required number of devs have a similar view
> on it, and then it's official?
I'd like to think I'm frank about things rather than an asshole about
things, in any case.
("But I thought you were Jon...")
In all seriousness, I haven't seen anyone say anything especially
inflammatory.
--
Jon Portnoy
avenj/irc.freenode.net
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
