Hi -- In portage now should be java-config 1.1.4 and it sports fixes for many bugs (including the one that I think Andrew is describing -- bug #32611) and version 1.1.5 is on it's way too :)
-- Jason A. Mobarak (aka Aether) On 19:14 Sat 08 Nov , Bryan ?stergaard wrote: > Aether should have solved that bug now as well as a couple of other > java-config bugs. > > Strider and me are trying to solve the rest of the bugs right now :) > > Anyway, java-config should be a lot better with the recent updates. > > Kloeri > > On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 12:36, Douglas Russell wrote: > > I can't remember exactly if it was this version but it seems likely, but I > > think I installed 1.1.2 and had a rather serious problem. It could not see or > > recognise any Java VM install. Hence it was totally useless. I downgraded and > > it was fine. I expect that was why it was removed. > > > > Puggy > > > > On Saturday 08 November 2003 6:26 am, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > > > Does anyone know the reason behind the big downgrade of java-config from > > > 1.1.2 to 0.2.8-r2? I took a peek in /usr/portage/dev-java/java-config and > > > the ebuild for 1.1.2 is gone. What gives? > > > > > > [ebuild UD] dev-java/java-config-0.2.8-r2 [1.1.2] > > > > > > -- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list > > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
