Hi -- I vote config-* and update-* -- the other names seem a little convoluted if the intent is to make a clear and concise tool naming scheme.
-- Jason A Mobarak (aka Aether on Freenode) On 00:26 Tue 18 Nov , Peter Ruskin wrote: > On Tuesday 18 Nov 2003 00:11, Markus Nigbur wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:18:42 +0800 > > > > William Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I dont see a problem with branding in this case (other than > > > gentoo-* sounding a bit ... odd!) > > > > > > how many other tools such as g-cpan.pl exist that few know about: > > > is there a consolidated list of these tools and what they do? If > > > not, some kind of consistent, hierarchal naming scheme will be a > > > godsend! > > > > > > So I am suggesting > > > g-update-etc, g-update-opengl > > > g-install-cpan, g-install-cran > > > g-config-distcc, g-config-java > > > and so on > > > > > > BillK > > > > Well, the whole idea is good, but those names are really considerable > > stupid-looking :( > > But apparently i can't think of anything better. > > > > -- Markus > > I think the first idea was the best: config-* > > Peter > -- > ====================================================================== > Portage 2.0.49-r15 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r3, > 2.4.23_pre8-gss) > i686 AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ > ====================================================================== > > > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
