On Thursday 20 November 2003 17:02, Jean Jordaan wrote: > 'lo Pieter > > Thanks for taking a look! > > > However I saw the following warning: > > > > WARNING: The cut doesn't work well in the current PyLog version > > Ah, but as usual with these open source things the next line is > "Any collaboration is welcome ;-)" .. perhaps your prolog zen is > deep enough to disolve the difficulty the PyLog devs saw :] > > > I was under the impression that prolog has very few dependencies > > and is able to interact with most languages (including python), > > My concern as a relative outsider is just that I love to be able > to browse the source of the glue that holds my system together, > namely portage, with some chance of understanding it .. which is > way higher with Python than with Prolog .. that said, PyLog parses > Prolog .. so much for that idea I guess.
What is the point in interpreting one language (prolog) in another interpreted language (pyton)? It can't be anything but inefficient. Paul -- Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
pgp00000.pgp
Description: signature
