On 11/28/03 Luke-Jr wrote: > On Friday 28 November 2003 07:13 am, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: > > If you want a "toolkit-independent tool," you might as well just > > write another toolkit that abstracts the various toolkits. (Of > > course, then you might decide you need to make the tool independent > > of the toolkit abstracter, and so you write another toolkit to > > abstract the abstracter.) This all seems like a lot of work to make > > the buttons match... > Too bad nobody's made a toolkit abstraction toolkit yet. It'd be nice > if GTK and Qt had wrappers to use each other.
There is wxGTK, so you just have to write a QT port for wxWindows. Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
