-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 December 2003 13:38, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard wrote: > > I must admit, I've thought the same things as well. Is this something > > that anybody else worries about too? That the USE flags are too general > > or at least not well enough defined. > > Yes, I certainly think we need per-package USE flags also.
the current state of portage i dont think it's doable (and in general i dont think it's really needed) ... perhaps you should put in something with portage-ng about this > > Hmmm, just looking through use.desc I couldn't really see any many other > > flags that immediately sprang to mind as being as bad as the "java" one. > > "mysql" is definately another candidate. > > How about "dedicated"? i dont see the issue with dedicated ... do you want to run a dedicated games server or do you want just the client stuff ? - -mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBP9THAkFjO5/oN/WBAQL1oA/5Ad6QmFgZNZl4XmbMHrOpMuKEEgR2tSX5 uek/aRVoHmx/Rckd1tmDLStwDaWRYC1bxQg2TGLUfz7nlwKQNmAeM0OTH28gp0EG 9Qx37mL0xmPMjt1ToRVsNUdV2CICOqnjIiFC1jji7H9zjbJOIqm0jFdHO2Q+3Gjl HXXQSGAz+tdUovz5bI8UPYGi8P3XecVEK7lBmRczPsDWtoZFNPNdbf2u4WmSfF/5 Fa6QxSw4APaDhdx6bj9DT3JMs60bFbbUAzJu6G38ZHja680i8X16qGE+d6E/OeWb xJvuZFyFXA2zD+ckioTnchBm07r7hPP93f7zby789pjuX9exFOskJZ8eN0UFau5A 5h+ApXBIpHoKNT6vYHr5+r2+E03kbxEW44P6UD5Qs6uvXCkgx5eRffNTmiuBZOoq kJe+4O0X5c5QeNOYIEE80E7PNfeK78cbqCIjooC6QVERpJgyfw1LEcbq8vOQRj0B lgr2OUuY662G9r0IlzxMLr6f8olBPNaLdBato53WlKTWCyRVGqQHYtj5JnhvZY4L 13cpe0JUMxLXJhheNFsX2z3ygor8XNt/ZxWZw+hCFLCIunpC2bF3qcW938cHdUg8 bq1+IwN65jovwvnduymO+OF9pV3tB2Nt1thHtRz6gPqFC0C33ObrS2QVFcXT9FID GFEwGQ1XFyI= =giI3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
