On Tuesday 09 December 2003 07:00, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Monday 08 December 2003 09:41 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Speaking of the java USE flag, I would suggest that a new java-dev flag > > should still add gcj to gcc. If a java developer doesn't want gcj, that's > > a per-package customization issue that will be fully supported in > > portage-ng (and 2.0.50?) > > Shouldn't gcj be enabled simply by java-user? How else are they going to > emerge/compile a Java pkg?
I haven't installed many java-based packages from source - only one that I can remember. It required virtual/jdk and pulled in blackdown. I figured all others would be the same. If they're not, that is simply another indication of the same problem. Regards, Jason Stubbs -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
