On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 03:43:05PM +0100 or thereabouts, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > I think that indeed subversion is superior to CVS, especially on the part > where you want to look at changesets and merging. Maybe we could test > subversion, but we might want to wait until the 1.0 version is released > for actual use (is going to be rather soon now)
As Chris mentioned, we were talking about this over dinner yesterday. For now, cvs is what we will be using for the main repository as it has proven to be mostly stable, if lacking in some features that we want/need. If we want to look at other solutions (subversion, arch, etc.) that's fine -- I just want to test them on less critical repositories. Then, if/when they have proven to be stable, scalable and in line with what we need, we can think about moving gentoo-x86 over to it. --kurt
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
