Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:I found
The last time we seriously tested svn we found that svn choked on a repository the size of the portage tree. The problem w/ arch (and w/ metacvs, which would be my preference), is that neither system has a good migration utility from cvs. The history of changes that is kept in our cvs tree is extremely valuable, and thus any new system that does not allow us to keep that history is a non-starter.
arch has cscvs to migrate the full history stored in a CVS archive to an arch (changeset-based) archive.
Cheers,
http://wiki.sourcecontrol.net/moin.cgi/Arch_20and_20CVS_20in_20the_20same_20tree
something that may be interesting if we want move to use arch/tla.
lu
-- Luca Barbato Developer Gentoo Linux http://www.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
